Middle East Journal of Rehabilitation and Health

Published by: Kowsar

Evaluation of the Correlation Between Myocardial Perfusion Scan Findings and Invasive Coronary Angiography Results

Rahimeh Eskandarian 1 , Mohammad Reza Razavi 2 , Somayeh Safaei 3 , Raheb Ghorbani 4 and Mohammad Forozeshfard 5 , *
Authors Information
1 Department of Cardiology, Kowsar Hospital, Semnan University of Medical Sciences, Semnan, Iran
2 Nursing Care Research Center, Semnan University of Medical Sciences, Semnan, Iran
3 Clinical Research Development Unit (CRDU), Kowsar hospital, Semnan University of Medical Sciences, Semnan, Iran
4 Social Determinants of Health Research Center, Semnan University of Medical Sciences, Semnan, Iran
5 Cancer Research Center and Department of Anesthesiology, Semnan University of Medical Sciences, Semnan, Iran
Article information
  • Middle East Journal of Rehabilitation and Health: April 2017, 4 (2); e45216
  • Published Online: February 28, 2017
  • Article Type: Research Article
  • Received: December 30, 2016
  • Revised: February 11, 2017
  • Accepted: February 16, 2017
  • DOI: 10.5812/mejrh.45216

To Cite: Eskandarian R, Razavi M R, Safaei S, Ghorbani R, Forozeshfard M. Evaluation of the Correlation Between Myocardial Perfusion Scan Findings and Invasive Coronary Angiography Results, Middle East J Rehabil Health Stud. 2017 ; 4(2):e45216. doi: 10.5812/mejrh.45216.

Abstract
Copyright © 2017, Semnan University of Medical Sciences. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits copy and redistribute the material just in noncommercial usages, provided the original work is properly cited.
1. Background
2. Methods
3. Results
4. Discussion
Acknowledgements
Footnotes
References
  • 1. Ali MK, Jaacks LM, Kowalski AJ, Siegel KR, Ezzati M. Noncommunicable Diseases: Three Decades Of Global Data Show A Mixture Of Increases And Decreases In Mortality Rates. Health Aff (Millwood). 2015; 34(9): 1444-55[DOI][PubMed]
  • 2. Bhatnagar P, Wickramasinghe K, Williams J, Rayner M, Townsend N. The epidemiology of cardiovascular disease in the UK 2014. Heart. 2015; 101(15): 1182-9[DOI][PubMed]
  • 3. Perk J, De Backer G, Gohlke H, Graham I, Reiner Z, Verschuren M, et al. European Guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice (version 2012). The Fifth Joint Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology and Other Societies on Cardiovascular Disease Prevention in Clinical Practice (constituted by representatives of nine societies and by invited experts). Eur Heart J. 2012; 33(13): 1635-701[DOI][PubMed]
  • 4. Karimi-Moonaghi H, Mojalli M, Khosravan S. Psychosocial complications of coronary artery disease. Iran Red Crescent Med J. 2014; 16(6)[DOI][PubMed]
  • 5. Talaei M, Sarrafzadegan N, Sadeghi M, Oveisgharan S, Marshall T, Thomas GN, et al. Incidence of cardiovascular diseases in an Iranian population: the Isfahan Cohort Study. Arch Iran Med. 2013; 16(3): 138-44[PubMed]
  • 6. Davis LL, Wright JS. The Million Hearts Initiative: how nurse practitioners can help lead. J Am Acad Nurse Pract. 2012; 24(10): 565-8[DOI][PubMed]
  • 7. Bikdeli B, Barreto-Filho JA. Reducing the cardiovascular disease burden: justified means for getting to the end. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2012; 5(4): 580-6[DOI][PubMed]
  • 8. Rapsomaniki E, Timmis A, George J, Pujades-Rodriguez M, Shah AD, Denaxas S, et al. Blood pressure and incidence of twelve cardiovascular diseases: lifetime risks, healthy life-years lost, and age-specific associations in 1.25 million people. Lancet. 2014; 383(9932): 1899-911[DOI][PubMed]
  • 9. Mann DL, Zipes DP, Libby P, Bonow RO. Braunwald's heart disease: a textbook of cardiovascular medicine. 2014;
  • 10. Go AS, Bauman MA, Coleman King SM, Fonarow GC, Lawrence W, Williams KA, et al. An effective approach to high blood pressure control: a science advisory from the American Heart Association, the American College of Cardiology, and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014; 63(12): 1230-8[DOI][PubMed]
  • 11. Finegold JA, Asaria P, Francis DP. Mortality from ischaemic heart disease by country, region, and age: statistics from World Health Organisation and United Nations. Int J Cardiol. 2013; 168(2): 934-45[DOI][PubMed]
  • 12. Muhlestein JB, Lappe DL, Lima JA, Rosen BD, May HT, Knight S, et al. Effect of screening for coronary artery disease using CT angiography on mortality and cardiac events in high-risk patients with diabetes: the FACTOR-64 randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2014; 312(21): 2234-43[DOI][PubMed]
  • 13. Rabar S, Harker M, O'Flynn N, Wierzbicki AS, Guideline Development G. Lipid modification and cardiovascular risk assessment for the primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease: summary of updated NICE guidance. BMJ. 2014; 349[DOI][PubMed]
  • 14. Valsangiacomo Buechel ER, Mertens LL. Imaging the right heart: the use of integrated multimodality imaging. Eur Heart J. 2012; 33(8): 949-60[DOI][PubMed]
  • 15. Renker M, Schoepf UJ, Wang R, Meinel FG, Rier JD, Bayer R2, et al. Comparison of diagnostic value of a novel noninvasive coronary computed tomography angiography method versus standard coronary angiography for assessing fractional flow reserve. Am J Cardiol. 2014; 114(9): 1303-8[DOI][PubMed]
  • 16. Levine GN, Bates ER, Blankenship JC, Bailey SR, Bittl JA, Cercek B, et al. 2011 ACCF/AHA/SCAI Guideline for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. A report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011; 58(24)-122[DOI][PubMed]
  • 17. Kasper D, Fauci A, Hauser S, Longo D, Jameson J, Loscalzo J. Harrison's Principles of internal medicine 19/E . 2015; 1 & 2
  • 18. Shaw LJ, Weintraub WS, Maron DJ, Hartigan PM, Hachamovitch R, Min JK, et al. Baseline stress myocardial perfusion imaging results and outcomes in patients with stable ischemic heart disease randomized to optimal medical therapy with or without percutaneous coronary intervention. Am Heart J. 2012; 164(2): 243-50[DOI][PubMed]
  • 19. Shaw LJ, Cerqueira MD, Brooks MM, Althouse AD, Sansing VV, Beller GA, et al. Impact of left ventricular function and the extent of ischemia and scar by stress myocardial perfusion imaging on prognosis and therapeutic risk reduction in diabetic patients with coronary artery disease: results from the Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation 2 Diabetes (BARI 2D) trial. J Nucl Cardiol. 2012; 19(4): 658-69[DOI][PubMed]
  • 20. George RT, Arbab-Zadeh A, Miller JM, Kitagawa K, Chang HJ, Bluemke DA, et al. Adenosine stress 64- and 256-row detector computed tomography angiography and perfusion imaging: a pilot study evaluating the transmural extent of perfusion abnormalities to predict atherosclerosis causing myocardial ischemia. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2009; 2(3): 174-82[DOI][PubMed]
  • 21. Lee TH, Boucher CA. Clinical practice. Noninvasive tests in patients with stable coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med. 2001; 344(24): 1840-5[DOI][PubMed]
  • 22. Schuijf JD, Wijns W, Jukema JW, Atsma DE, de Roos A, Lamb HJ, et al. Relationship between noninvasive coronary angiography with multi-slice computed tomography and myocardial perfusion imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006; 48(12): 2508-14[DOI][PubMed]
  • 23. Takx RA, Blomberg BA, El Aidi H, Habets J, de Jong PA, Nagel E, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of stress myocardial perfusion imaging compared to invasive coronary angiography with fractional flow reserve meta-analysis. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015; 8(1)[DOI][PubMed]
  • 24. Schuijf JD, van Werkhoven JM, Pundziute G, Jukema JW, Decramer I, Stokkel MP, et al. Invasive versus noninvasive evaluation of coronary artery disease. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2008; 1(2): 190-9[DOI][PubMed]
  • 25. Li JM, Li T, Shi RF, Zhang LR. Comparative Analysis between SPECT Myocardial Perfusion Imaging and CT Coronary Angiography for Diagnosis of Coronary Artery Disease. Int J Mol Imaging. 2012; 2012: 253475[DOI][PubMed]
  • 26. Tamarappoo BK, Dey D, Nakazato R, Shmilovich H, Smith T, Cheng VY, et al. Comparison of the extent and severity of myocardial perfusion defects measured by CT coronary angiography and SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2010; 3(10): 1010-9[DOI][PubMed]
  • 27. Wang F, Amanullah A, Kiat H, Friedman J, Berman D. Diagnostic efficacy of stress technetium 99m-labeled sestamibi myocardial perfusion single-photon emission computed tomography in detection of coronary artery disease among patients over age 80*. J Nucl Cardiol. 1995; 2(5): 380-8[DOI]
  • 28. Hannoush H, Shaar K, Alam S, Nasrallah A, Sawaya J, Dakik HA. Analysis of referral patterns, predictive accuracy, and impact on patient management of myocardial perfusion imaging in a new nuclear cardiology laboratory. J Nucl Cardiol. 2003; 10(2): 148-53[DOI][PubMed]
  • 29. Elhendy A, Sozzi FB, van Domburg RT, Bax JJ, Geleijnse ML, Valkema R, et al. Accuracy of exercise stress technetium 99m sestamibi SPECT imaging in the evaluation of the extent and location of coronary artery disease in patients with an earlier myocardial infarction. J Nucl Cardiol. 2000; 7(5): 432-8[DOI][PubMed]
  • 30. Johansen AH, Poulsen TS, Hoilund-Carlsen PF, Thayssen P, Gaster AL, Veje A, et al. Myocardial perfusion imaging and coronary angiography in patients with known or suspected stable angina pectoris. Dan Med Bull. 2001; 48(2): 80-3[PubMed]
  • 31. Vakili A. Comparative study for myocardial perfusion imaging by SPECT and coronary angiography. Iran J Nucl Med. 1996; 6: 8-11
  • 32. Fard-Esfahani A, Fallahi B, Saghari M, Eftekhari M, Beiki D. Myocardial perfusion scan accuracy in detection of coronary artery disease-comparison with exercise stress test [In Persian]. Iran J Nucl Med. 2007; 15: 16-23
  • 33. Shelley S, Indirani M, Sathyamurthy I, Subramanian K, Priti N, Harshad K, et al. Correlation of myocardial perfusion SPECT with invasive and computed tomography coronary angiogram. Indian Heart J. 2012; 64(1): 43-9[DOI][PubMed]
  • 34. Fiechter M, Ghadri JR, Kuest SM, Pazhenkottil AP, Wolfrum M, Nkoulou RN, et al. Nuclear myocardial perfusion imaging with a novel cadmium-zinc-telluride detector SPECT/CT device: first validation versus invasive coronary angiography. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2011; 38(11): 2025-30[DOI][PubMed]
Creative Commons License Except where otherwise noted, this work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 4.0 International License .

Search Relations:

Author(s):

Article(s):

Create Citiation Alert
via Google Reader

Readers' Comments