Middle East Journal of Rehabilitation and Health

Published by: Kowsar

Event-Related Brain Potentials During Picture Naming, Using Early and Late Acquired Words

Seyyedeh Hoorya Hosseini 1 , Ahmad Reza Khatoonabadi 1 , * , Hooshang Dadgar 1 , Mahsa Saadati 2 and Gholam Ali Hossein Zade 3
Authors Information
1 Department of Speech Therapy, School of Rehabilitation, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, IR Iran
2 Statistical Center of Iran, National Population Studies and Comprehensive Management Institute, Tehran, IR Iran
3 Department of Electrical Engineering School of ECE, College of Engineering, University of Tehran, IR Iran
Article information
  • Middle East Journal of Rehabilitation and Health: April 01, 2015, 2 (2); e26717
  • Published Online: April 25, 2015
  • Article Type: Research Article
  • Received: January 7, 2015
  • Revised: March 16, 2015
  • Accepted: April 2, 2015
  • DOI: 10.17795/mejrh-26717

To Cite: Hosseini S H, Khatoonabadi A R, Dadgar H, Saadati M, Hossein Zade G A. Event-Related Brain Potentials During Picture Naming, Using Early and Late Acquired Words, Middle East J Rehabil Health Stud. 2015 ; 2(2):e26717. doi: 10.17795/mejrh-26717.

Copyright © 2015, Semnan University of Medical Sciences. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits copy and redistribute the material just in noncommercial usages, provided the original work is properly cited.
1. Background
2. Objectives
3. Patients and Methods
4. Results
5. Discussion
  • 1. Laganaro M, Perret C. Comparing electrophysiological correlates of word production in immediate and delayed naming through the analysis of word age of acquisition effects. Brain Topogr. 2011; 24(1): 19-29[DOI][PubMed]
  • 2. Indefrey P. The spatial and temporal signatures of word production components: a critical update. Front Psychol. 2011; 2: 255[DOI][PubMed]
  • 3. Indefrey P, Levelt WJ. The new cognitive neurosciences. 2000; : 845-65
  • 4. Cortese MJ, Khanna MM. Age of acquisition ratings for 3,000 monosyllabic words. Behav Res Methods. 2008; 40(3): 791-4[PubMed]
  • 5. Chapey R. Language intervention strategies in aphasia and related neurogenic communication disorders. 2001;
  • 6. Bormann T, Kulke F, Blanken G. The influence of word frequency on semantic word substitutions in aphasic naming. Aphasiol. 2008; 22(12): 1313-20[DOI]
  • 7. Belke E, Brysbaert M, Meyer AS, Ghyselinck M. Age of acquisition effects in picture naming: evidence for a lexical-semantic competition hypothesis. Cognition. 2005; 96(2)-54[DOI][PubMed]
  • 8. Chalard M, Bonin P. Age-of-acquisition effects in picture naming: Are they structural and/or semantic in nature? Visual Cognition. 2006; 13(7-8): 864-83[DOI]
  • 9. Morrison CM, Ellis AW. Roles of word frequency and age of acquisition in word naming and lexical decision. J Experim Psychol: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. 1995; 21(1): 116-33[DOI]
  • 10. Morrison CM, Ellis AW, Quinlan PT. Age of acquisition, not word frequency, affects object naming, not object recognition. Mem Cognit. 1992; 20(6): 705-14[PubMed]
  • 11. Gerhand S, Barry C. Word frequency effects in oral reading are not merely age-of-acquisition effects in disguise. J Experim Psychol: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. 1998; 24(2): 267-83[DOI]
  • 12. Brown GD, Watson FL. First in, first out: word learning age and spoken word frequency as predictors of word familiarity and word naming latency. Mem Cognit. 1987; 15(3): 208-16[PubMed]
  • 13. Mobaghan J, Ellis AW. Age of acquisition and the completeness of phonological representations. Reading and Writing. 2002; 15(7/8): 759-88[DOI]
  • 14. Johnston RA, Barry C. Age of acquisition effects in the semantic processing of pictures. Mem Cognit. 2005; 33(5): 905-12[PubMed]
  • 15. Eulitz C, Hauk O, Cohen R. Electroencephalographic activity over temporal brain areas during phonological encoding in picture naming. Clin Neurophysiol. 2000; 111(11): 2088-97[PubMed]
  • 16. Koester D, Schiller NO. Morphological priming in overt language production: electrophysiological evidence from Dutch. Neuroimage. 2008; 42(4): 1622-30[DOI][PubMed]
  • 17. Strijkers K, Costa A, Thierry G. Tracking lexical access in speech production: electrophysiological correlates of word frequency and cognate effects. Cereb Cortex. 2010; 20(4): 912-28[DOI][PubMed]
  • 18. Oldfield RC. The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia. 1971; 9(1): 97-113[PubMed]
  • 19. Tahanzadeh B, Soleymani Z, Khoddami SM, Mehri A, Jalaie S. Validity and reliability of oral picture-naming test in aphasic adults. Audiology. 2012; 21(4): 84-93
  • 20. Indefrey P, Levelt WJ. The spatial and temporal signatures of word production components. Cognition. 2004; 92(1-2): 101-44[DOI][PubMed]
  • 21. Bonin P, Chalard M, Meot A, Fayol M. The determinants of spoken and written picture naming latencies. Br J Psychol. 2002; 93: 89-114[PubMed]
  • 22. Cuetos F, Barbon A, Urrutia M, Dominguez A. Determining the time course of lexical frequency and age of acquisition using ERP. Clin Neurophysiol. 2009; 120(2): 285-94[DOI][PubMed]
  • 23. Tainturier MJ, Tamminen J, Thierry G. Age of acquisition modulates the amplitude of the P300 component in spoken word recognition. Neurosci Lett. 2005; 379(1): 17-22[DOI][PubMed]
Creative Commons License Except where otherwise noted, this work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 4.0 International License .

Search Relations:



Create Citiation Alert
via Google Reader

Readers' Comments