Middle East Journal of Rehabilitation and Health

Published by: Kowsar

Event-Related Brain Potentials During Picture Naming, Using Early and Late Acquired Words

Seyyedeh Hoorya Hosseini 1 , Ahmad Reza Khatoonabadi 1 , * , Hooshang Dadgar 1 , Mahsa Saadati 2 and Gholam Ali Hossein Zade 3
Authors Information
1 Department of Speech Therapy, School of Rehabilitation, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, IR Iran
2 Statistical Center of Iran, National Population Studies and Comprehensive Management Institute, Tehran, IR Iran
3 Department of Electrical Engineering School of ECE, College of Engineering, University of Tehran, IR Iran
Article information
  • Middle East Journal of Rehabilitation and Health: April 01, 2015, 2 (2); e26717
  • Published Online: April 25, 2015
  • Article Type: Research Article
  • Received: January 7, 2015
  • Revised: March 16, 2015
  • Accepted: April 2, 2015
  • DOI: 10.17795/mejrh-26717

To Cite: Hosseini S H, Khatoonabadi A R, Dadgar H, Saadati M, Hossein Zade G A. Event-Related Brain Potentials During Picture Naming, Using Early and Late Acquired Words, Middle East J Rehabil Health Stud. 2015 ; 2(2):e26717. doi: 10.17795/mejrh-26717.

Abstract
Copyright © 2015, Semnan University of Medical Sciences. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits copy and redistribute the material just in noncommercial usages, provided the original work is properly cited.
1. Background
2. Objectives
3. Patients and Methods
4. Results
5. Discussion
Acknowledgements
Footnotes
References
  • 1. Laganaro M, Perret C. Comparing electrophysiological correlates of word production in immediate and delayed naming through the analysis of word age of acquisition effects. Brain Topogr. 2011; 24(1): 19-29[DOI][PubMed]
  • 2. Indefrey P. The spatial and temporal signatures of word production components: a critical update. Front Psychol. 2011; 2: 255[DOI][PubMed]
  • 3. Indefrey P, Levelt WJ. The new cognitive neurosciences. 2000; : 845-65
  • 4. Cortese MJ, Khanna MM. Age of acquisition ratings for 3,000 monosyllabic words. Behav Res Methods. 2008; 40(3): 791-4[PubMed]
  • 5. Chapey R. Language intervention strategies in aphasia and related neurogenic communication disorders. 2001;
  • 6. Bormann T, Kulke F, Blanken G. The influence of word frequency on semantic word substitutions in aphasic naming. Aphasiol. 2008; 22(12): 1313-20[DOI]
  • 7. Belke E, Brysbaert M, Meyer AS, Ghyselinck M. Age of acquisition effects in picture naming: evidence for a lexical-semantic competition hypothesis. Cognition. 2005; 96(2)-54[DOI][PubMed]
  • 8. Chalard M, Bonin P. Age-of-acquisition effects in picture naming: Are they structural and/or semantic in nature? Visual Cognition. 2006; 13(7-8): 864-83[DOI]
  • 9. Morrison CM, Ellis AW. Roles of word frequency and age of acquisition in word naming and lexical decision. J Experim Psychol: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. 1995; 21(1): 116-33[DOI]
  • 10. Morrison CM, Ellis AW, Quinlan PT. Age of acquisition, not word frequency, affects object naming, not object recognition. Mem Cognit. 1992; 20(6): 705-14[PubMed]
  • 11. Gerhand S, Barry C. Word frequency effects in oral reading are not merely age-of-acquisition effects in disguise. J Experim Psychol: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. 1998; 24(2): 267-83[DOI]
  • 12. Brown GD, Watson FL. First in, first out: word learning age and spoken word frequency as predictors of word familiarity and word naming latency. Mem Cognit. 1987; 15(3): 208-16[PubMed]
  • 13. Mobaghan J, Ellis AW. Age of acquisition and the completeness of phonological representations. Reading and Writing. 2002; 15(7/8): 759-88[DOI]
  • 14. Johnston RA, Barry C. Age of acquisition effects in the semantic processing of pictures. Mem Cognit. 2005; 33(5): 905-12[PubMed]
  • 15. Eulitz C, Hauk O, Cohen R. Electroencephalographic activity over temporal brain areas during phonological encoding in picture naming. Clin Neurophysiol. 2000; 111(11): 2088-97[PubMed]
  • 16. Koester D, Schiller NO. Morphological priming in overt language production: electrophysiological evidence from Dutch. Neuroimage. 2008; 42(4): 1622-30[DOI][PubMed]
  • 17. Strijkers K, Costa A, Thierry G. Tracking lexical access in speech production: electrophysiological correlates of word frequency and cognate effects. Cereb Cortex. 2010; 20(4): 912-28[DOI][PubMed]
  • 18. Oldfield RC. The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia. 1971; 9(1): 97-113[PubMed]
  • 19. Tahanzadeh B, Soleymani Z, Khoddami SM, Mehri A, Jalaie S. Validity and reliability of oral picture-naming test in aphasic adults. Audiology. 2012; 21(4): 84-93
  • 20. Indefrey P, Levelt WJ. The spatial and temporal signatures of word production components. Cognition. 2004; 92(1-2): 101-44[DOI][PubMed]
  • 21. Bonin P, Chalard M, Meot A, Fayol M. The determinants of spoken and written picture naming latencies. Br J Psychol. 2002; 93: 89-114[PubMed]
  • 22. Cuetos F, Barbon A, Urrutia M, Dominguez A. Determining the time course of lexical frequency and age of acquisition using ERP. Clin Neurophysiol. 2009; 120(2): 285-94[DOI][PubMed]
  • 23. Tainturier MJ, Tamminen J, Thierry G. Age of acquisition modulates the amplitude of the P300 component in spoken word recognition. Neurosci Lett. 2005; 379(1): 17-22[DOI][PubMed]
Creative Commons License Except where otherwise noted, this work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 4.0 International License .

Search Relations:

Author(s):

Article(s):

Create Citiation Alert
via Google Reader

Readers' Comments