Middle East Journal of Rehabilitation and Health

Published by: Kowsar

Comparison of Misgav-Ladach and Pfannenstiel-Kerr Techniques for Cesarean Section: A Randomized Controlled Trial Study

Sanam Moradan 1 , * and Majid Mirmohammadkhani 2
Authors Information
1 Abnormal Uterine Bleeding Research Center, Semnan University of Medical Sciences, Semnan, IR Iran
2 Social Determinants of Health Research Center, Department of Community Medicine, Semnan University of Medical Sciences, Semnan, IR Iran
Article information
  • Middle East Journal of Rehabilitation and Health: October 01, 2016, 3 (4); e38541
  • Published Online: September 26, 2016
  • Article Type: Research Article
  • Received: April 17, 2016
  • Revised: September 13, 2016
  • Accepted: September 14, 2016
  • DOI: 10.17795/mejrh-38541

To Cite: Moradan S, Mirmohammadkhani M. Comparison of Misgav-Ladach and Pfannenstiel-Kerr Techniques for Cesarean Section: A Randomized Controlled Trial Study, Middle East J Rehabil Health Stud. 2016 ; 3(4):e38541. doi: 10.17795/mejrh-38541.

Abstract
Copyright © 2016, Semnan University of Medical Sciences. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits copy and redistribute the material just in noncommercial usages, provided the original work is properly cited.
1. Background
2. Methods
3. Results
4. Discussion
References
  • 1. Holmgren G, Sjoholm L, Stark M. The Misgav Ladach method for cesarean section: method description. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1999; 78(7): 615-21[PubMed]
  • 2. Joel-Cohen S. Abdominal and vaginal hysterectomy: new techniques based on time and motion studies. 1972;
  • 3. Chapman SJ, Owen J, Hauth JC. One- versus two-layer closure of a low transverse cesarean: the next pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol. 1997; 89(1): 16-8[PubMed]
  • 4. Hauth JC, Owen J, Davis RO. Transverse uterine incision closure: one versus two layers. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1992; 167(4 Pt 1): 1108-11[PubMed]
  • 5. Jelsema RD, Wittingen JA, Vander Kolk KJ. Continuous, nonlocking, single-layer repair of the low transverse uterine incision. J Reprod Med. 1993; 38(5): 393-6[PubMed]
  • 6. Tucker JM, Hauth JC, Hodgkins P, Owen J, Winkler CL. Trial of labor after a one- or two-layer closure of a low transverse uterine incision. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1993; 168(2): 545-6[PubMed]
  • 7. Enkin MW. Single versus two layer suturing for closing the uterine incision at caesarean section. 2002;
  • 8. Tulandi T, Hum HS, Gelfand MM. Closure of laparotomy incisions with or without peritoneal suturing and second-look laparoscopy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1988; 158(3 Pt 1): 536-7[PubMed]
  • 9. Irion O, Lwuy F, Beguin F. Nonclosure of the visceral and parietal peritoneum at caesarean section: A randomised controlled trial. Obst Gynaecol Int J. 1996; 103(7): 690-4
  • 10. Hull DB, Varner MW. A randomized study of closure of the peritoneum at cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 1991; 77(6): 818-21[PubMed]
  • 11. Pietrantoni M, Parsons MT, O'Brien WF, Collins E, Knuppel RA, Spellacy WN. Peritoneal closure or non-closure at cesarean. Obstet Gynecol. 1991; 77(2): 293-6[PubMed]
  • 12. Nagele F, Karas H, Spitzer D, Staudach A, Karasegh S, Beck A, et al. Closure or nonclosure of the visceral peritoneum at cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996; 174(4): 1366-70[PubMed]
  • 13. Wilkinson C, Enkin MW. Peritoneal non-closure at caesarean section. 1999; 2
  • 14. Grundsell HS, Rizk DE, Kumar RM. Randomized study of non-closure of peritoneum in lower segment cesarean section. Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica. 1998; 77(1): 110-5
  • 15. Stark M, Finkel AR. Comparison between the Joel-Cohen and Pfannenstiel incisions in cesarean section. Euro J Obst Gynecol Reproduct Biol. 1994; 53(2): 121-2
  • 16. Stark M, Chavkin Y, Kupfersztain C, Guedj P, Finkel AR. Evaluation of combinations of procedures in cesarean section. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 1995; 48(3): 273-6[PubMed]
  • 17. Fatusic Z, Hudic I, Music A. Misgav-Ladach cesarean section: general consideration. Acta Clin Croat. 2011; 50(1): 95-9[PubMed]
  • 18. Studzinski Z. [The Misgav-Ladach method for cesarean section compared to the Pfannenstiel technique]. Ginekol Pol. 2002; 73(8): 672-6[PubMed]
  • 19. Moreira P, Moreau JC, Faye ME, Ka S, Kane Gueye SM, Faye EO, et al. [Comparison of two cesarean techniques: classic versus Misgav Ladach cesarean]. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 2002; 31(6): 572-6[PubMed]
  • 20. Fatusic Z, Kurjak A, Jasarevic E, Hafner T. The Misgav Ladach method--a step forward in operative technique in obstetrics. J Perinat Med. 2003; 31(5): 395-8[DOI][PubMed]
  • 21. Vitale SG, Marilli I, Cignini P, Padula F, D'Emidio L, Mangiafico L, et al. Comparison between modified Misgav-Ladach and Pfannenstiel-Kerr techniques for Cesarean section: review of literature. J Prenat Med. 2014; 8(3-4): 36-41[PubMed]
  • 22. Fatusic Z, Hudic I. Incidence of post-operative adhesions following Misgav Ladach caesarean section--a comparative study. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2009; 22(2): 157-60[DOI][PubMed]
  • 23. Gutierrez JG, Colo JA, Arreola MS. [Comparative trial between traditional cesarean section and Misgav-Ladach technique]. Ginecol Obstet Mex. 2008; 76(2): 75-80[PubMed]
  • 24. Oleszczuk J, Leszczynska-Gorzelak B, Michalak B, Pietras G. [Delivery of twins by Cesarean section with the Misgav Ladach method]. Ginekol Pol. 2000; 71(11): 1417-21[PubMed]
  • 25. Hudic I, Fatusic Z, Kameric L, Misic M, Serak I, Latifagic A. Vaginal delivery after Misgav-Ladach cesarean section--is the risk of uterine rupture acceptable? J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2010; 23(10): 1156-9[DOI][PubMed]
  • 26. Ezechi O, Ezeobi P, Gab-Okafor C, Edet A, Nwokoro C, Akinlade A. Maternal and fetal effect of misgav ladach cesarean section in nigerian women: a randomized control study. Ann Med Health Sci Res. 2013; 3(4): 577-82[DOI][PubMed]
  • 27. Hudic I, Bujold E, Fatusic Z, Skokic F, Latifagic A, Kapidzic M, et al. The Misgav-Ladach method of cesarean section: a step forward in operative technique in obstetrics. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2012; 286(5): 1141-6[DOI][PubMed]
  • 28. Ghahiry A, Rezaei F, Karimi Khouzani R, Ashrafinia M. Comparative analysis of long-term outcomes of Misgav Ladach technique cesarean section and traditional cesarean section. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2012; 38(10): 1235-9[DOI][PubMed]
  • 29. Bolze PA, Massoud M, Gaucherand P, Doret M. What about the Misgav-Ladach surgical technique in patients with previous cesarean sections? Am J Perinatol. 2013; 30(3): 197-200[DOI][PubMed]
Creative Commons License Except where otherwise noted, this work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 4.0 International License .

Search Relations:

Author(s):

Article(s):

Create Citiation Alert
via Google Reader

Readers' Comments