Is Glucosamine/Chondroitin Sulfate effective in the Long-Term on the Progression of Structural Changes in Knee Osteoarthritis?

Marcos Edgar Fernandez-Cuadros; Luz Otilia Casique-Bocanegra

doi:10.5812/mejrh.57489

Is Glucosamine/Chondroitin Sulfate effective in the Long-Term on the Progression of Structural Changes in Knee Osteoarthritis?

Marcos Edgar Fernandez-Cuadros ^{1 , 2 , *} and Luz Otilia Casique-Bocanegra ³

Authors Information

¹ Physical Medicine and Rehabilition Department, Hospital Universitario Santa Cristina, Madrid, Spain

² Physical Medicine and Rehabilition Department, Fundacion Hospital General Santisima Trinidad, Salamanca, Spain

³ Familiar Medicine, Gabinete Clinico Santa Clara, Zamora, Spain

Article information

Middle East Journal of Rehabilitation and Health Studies: July 2017, 4 (3); e57489
Published Online: July 13, 2017
Article Type: Letter
Received: April 15, 2017
Revised: April 23, 2017
Accepted: April 25, 2017
DOI: 10.5812/mejrh.57489

To Cite: Fernandez-Cuadros M E, Casique-Bocanegra L O. Is Glucosamine/Chondroitin Sulfate effective in the Long-Term on the Progression of Structural Changes in Knee Osteoarthritis?, Middle East J Rehabil Health Stud. 2017 ;4(3):e57489. doi: 10.5812/mejrh.57489.

Copyright: Copyright © 2017, Middle East Journal of Rehabilitation and Health Studies. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits copy and redistribute the material just in noncommercial usages, provided the original work is properly cited.

To the Editor,

Osteoarthritis (OA) is the most common and disabling disease on the autonomy of older people and it affects the quality of life (1) in the over 70 years population (2). OA has no cure and becomes an important problem of public health. The main goals are to ameliorate pain, inflammation and rigidity, and to diminish articular damage and joint destruction (3, 4).

Glucosamine and Chondroitin sulfate (G/CS) have proven symptomatic slow acting effects on the knee OA; however, its disease modifying drug effect for OA is controversial (5, 6). To demonstrate the disease modifying effect (slowing/reversal of OA progression), it is necessary to perform prospective studies in long periods of time, ideally 1 - 2 years or more (5).

OA affects the cartilage and subchondral bone. The joint space width (JSW) narrowing is not symmetrical. JSW is an indicator of OA progression. In fact, there is a linear negative correlation between cartilage volume loss and OA severity. The lower the JSW, the greater the knee OA severity (7). That correlation is only valid for the medial compartment, due to the fact that for the lateral compartment, the greater the JSW, the greater the OA severity (8). The JSW narrows usually in the weight bearing compartment (mainly medial) and it widens on the contralateral compartment (frequently lateral), which is a phenomena known as the yawn sign (1). Boegard, in a 2-year follow-up study (55 patients, age range 35 - 54), has noticed that the mean minimal JSW diminishes in the medial tibiofemoral compartment, while the same space increases in the lateral tibiofemoral compartment (9). Ledingham, in a 2-year follow-up study (knee OA patients), observed that an increase in JSW was only seen in the lateral tibiofemoral compartment and corresponded with narrowing of the contralateral (medial) worst affected compartment (10). Lanyon, in a 3-year follow-up study reported the narrowing of both medial and lateral tibiofemoral compartments (51 patients, age average 71) (11). These anatomical changes reveal the natural history of knee OA. Besides, the poorer accuracy and precision of measurement on lateral compartment progression is attributable to the variable degree of subluxation in this compartment as a result of medial compartment disease (12).

In a recent brief report (13) published at the arthritis care and research entitled “Long-term effects of Glucosamine/Chondroitin Sulfate on the progression of structural changes in Knee Osteoarthritis: 6-year follow-up data from the Osteoarthritis Initiative”, these conclusions have been stated: 1) G/CS had no effect on the medial compartment when assessed by radiographic parameters; 2) G/CS diminished cartilage volume loss in global knee and lateral compartment, however, not on the medial compartment; 3) the protective effect on cartilage was not associated to symptom improvement measured by WOMAC.

In this study, there are some issues to comment. First, the volume of the medial compartment was similar in both groups. The volume of the lateral compartment was greater in the treatment group (G/CS) than in the not-exposed group, but without difference. Indeed, the not-exposed group had a greater JSW than the treatment group (P = 0.049). Second, the evolution on X-rays and cartilage volume loss, at 6-year for the medial compartment, showed an even lower loss on the not-exposed group than in the treatment group (G/CS), although not significant (P = 0.496). Third, the protective effect of G/CS was only seen on the lateral compartment (P < 0.001). As it was stated (1, 9-11), the collapse of the medial compartment produces abnormal forces that could contribute to changes in the lateral compartment, and increase the JSW as a result. Finally, the actual dose of G/CS and the adherence rate of the population could not be determined. Moreover, the protective effect on cartilage was not associated to the symptom improvement measured by WOMAC. On that scenario, the protective effect of G/CS on the lateral compartment and the non-protective effect in the medial compartment could just be a result of progression in the natural history of Knee OA as stated by Boegard, Ledingham, Lanyon, and Fernandez-Cuadros (1, 9, 10).

Due to the fact that all of the arguments exposed the Long-term effects of G/CS on the progression of structural changes in knee OA, specially the asseveration that G/CS protects the lateral but not the medial compartment, based on radiographic assumptions, it should be taken with caution.

References

1. Fernandez-Cuadros ME. Análisis de la Calidad de Vida en pacientes con Prótesis de Rodilla España: Universidad de Salamanca 2013;
2. Moreno Palacios JA, Catedra Valles E, Plazas Andreu N, Sancho Loras R, Manjon-Cabezas Subirats J, Mozo Muriel A. [Comparative results of total knee arthroplasty according to age]. Rev Esp Geriatr Gerontol. 2009; 44(3): 120-3[DOI][PubMed]
3. Vaillant JD, Fraga A, Diaz MT, Mallok A, Viebahn-Hansler R, Fahmy Z, et al. Ozone oxidative postconditioning ameliorates joint damage and decreases pro-inflammatory cytokine levels and oxidative stress in PG/PS-induced arthritis in rats. Eur J Pharmacol. 2013; 714(1-3): 318-24[DOI][PubMed]
4. Battle-Gualda E, Benito-Ruiz P, Blanco-Garcia F, Martin-Mola E. Manual SER de la artrosis. Espa-a: Sociedad Espa-ola de Reumatología. 2002;
5. Garcia AG, Gandia L. El condroitín sulfato y la glucosamina frenan la progresion de la artrosis y disminuyen la necesidad de protesis. Actualizacion en Farmacologia y Terapeutica. 2014; 12(3): 145-53
6. Martel-Pelletier J, Roubille C, Abram F, Hochberg MC, Dorais M, Delorme P, et al. First-line analysis of the effects of treatment on progression of structural changes in knee osteoarthritis over 24 months: data from the osteoarthritis initiative progression cohort. Ann Rheum Dis. 2015; 74(3): 547-56[DOI][PubMed]
7. Cicuttini FM, Wluka AE, Forbes A, Wolfe R. Comparison of tibial cartilage volume and radiologic grade of the tibiofemoral joint. Arthritis Rheum. 2003; 48(3): 682-8[DOI][PubMed]
8. Fernandez-Cuadros ME, Susana Perez-Moro O, Albaladejo-Florin MJ. Knee Osteoarthritis: Condroprotector Action and Symptomatic Effect of Ozone on Pain, Function, Quality of Life, Minimal Joint Space and Knee Arthroplasty Delay. Middle East J Rehabil Health. 2016; 4(1)[DOI]
9. Boegard TL, Rudling O, Petersson IF, Jonsson K. Joint space width of the tibiofemoral and of the patellofemoral joint in chronic knee pain with or without radiographic osteoarthritis: a 2-year follow-up. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2003; 11(5): 370-6[DOI]
10. Ledingham J, Regan M, Jones A, Doherty M. Factors affecting radiographic progression of knee osteoarthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 1995; 54(1): 53-8[PubMed]
11. Lanyon P, Muir K, Doherty S, Doherty M. Age and sex differences in hip joint space among asymptomatic subjects without structural change: implications for epidemiologic studies. Arthritis Rheum. 2003; 48(4): 1041-6[DOI][PubMed]
12. Buckland-Wright JC, Macfarlane DG, Williams SA, Ward RJ. Accuracy and precision of joint space width measurements in standard and macroradiographs of osteoarthritic knees. Ann Rheum Dis. 1995; 54(11): 872-80[PubMed]
13. Raynauld JP, Pelletier JP, Abram F, Dodin P, Delorme P, Martel-Pelletier J. Long-Term Effects of Glucosamine and Chondroitin Sulfate on the Progression of Structural Changes in Knee Osteoarthritis: Six-Year Followup Data From the Osteoarthritis Initiative. Arthritis Care Res. 2016; 68(10): 1560-6[DOI]

Middle East Journal of Rehabilitation and Health

Published by: Kowsar

Is Glucosamine/Chondroitin Sulfate effective in the Long-Term on the Progression of Structural Changes in Knee Osteoarthritis?

Article information

References

Share on: