Middle East Journal of Rehabilitation and Health

Published by: Kowsar

Barriers and Challenges Experienced by Seniors in Using Online Social Networks: A Phenomenological Study

Marjan Momeni 1 , Nadjla Hariri 2 , * , Monir Nobahar 3 , 4 and Fatemeh Noshinfard 5
Authors Information
1 PhD Student, Department of Knowledge and Information Science, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
2 Professor, Department of Knowledge and Information Science, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
3 Associate Professor, Nursing Care Research Center, Semnan University of Medical Sciences, Semnan, Iran
4 Associate Professor, Faculty of Nursing and Midwifery, Semnan University of Medical Sciences, Semnan, Iran
5 Associate Professor, Department of Knowledge and Information Science, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
Article information
  • Middle East Journal of Rehabilitation and Health: January 2018, 5 (1); e65310
  • Published Online: January 31, 2018
  • Article Type: Research Article
  • Received: December 18, 2017
  • Revised: January 23, 2018
  • Accepted: January 24, 2018
  • DOI: 10.5812/mejrh.65310

To Cite: Momeni M, Hariri N, Nobahar M, Noshinfard F. Barriers and Challenges Experienced by Seniors in Using Online Social Networks: A Phenomenological Study, Middle East J Rehabil Health Stud. 2018 ; 5(1):e65310. doi: 10.5812/mejrh.65310.

Copyright © 2018, Middle East Journal of Rehabilitation and Health Studies. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits copy and redistribute the material just in noncommercial usages, provided the original work is properly cited.
1. Background
2. Methods
3. Results
4. Discussion
  • 1. Marcelino I, Laza R, Pereira A. SSN: Senior social network for improving quality of life. Inter J Distributed Sensor Network. 2016;12(7):2150734. doi: 10.1177/155014772150734.
  • 2. Lin KY, Lu HP. Why people use social networking sites: An empirical study integrating network externalities and motivation theory. Computers Human Behav. 2011;27(3):1152-61. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2010.12.009.
  • 3. Mirzaei M, Shams-Ghahfarkhi M. Demographic characteristics of the elderly population in Iran according to the census 1976-2006. Iran J Age. 2007;2(5):326-31.
  • 4. Quan-Haase A, Mo GY, Wellman B. Connected seniors: how older adults in East York exchange social support online and offline. Inf Commun Soc. 2017:1-17.
  • 5. Bahramnezhad F, Chalik R, Bastani F, Taherpour M, Navab E. The social network among the elderly and its relationship with quality of life. Electron Physician. 2017;9(5):4306-11. doi: 10.19082/4306. [PubMed: 28713500].
  • 6. Wang X. Subjective well-being associated with size of social network and social support of elderly. J Health Psychol. 2016;21(6):1037-42. doi: 10.1177/1359105314544136. [PubMed: 25104778].
  • 7. Vosner HB, Bobek S, Kokol P, Krečič MJ. Attitudes of active older Internet users towards online social networking. Computers Human Behav. 2016;55:230-41. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2015.09.014.
  • 8. Ihm J, Hsieh YP. The implications of information and communication technology use for the social well-being of older adults. Inf Commun Soc. 2015;18(10):1123-38. doi: 10.1080/1369118X.2015.1019912.
  • 9. Heo J, Chun S, Lee S, Lee KH, Kim J. Internet use and well-being in older adults. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2015;18(5):268-72. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2014.0549.
  • 10. Pittman M, Reich B. Social media and loneliness: Why an instagram picture may be worth more than a thousand twitter words. Computers Human Behav. 2016;62:155-67. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2016.03.084.
  • 11. Nef T, Ganea RL, Muri RM, Mosimann UP. Social networking sites and older users - a systematic review. Int Psychogeriatr. 2013;25(7):1041-53. doi: 10.1017/S1041610213000355. [PubMed: 23552297].
  • 12. Chopik WJ. The Benefits of Social Technology Use Among Older Adults Are Mediated by Reduced Loneliness. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2016;19(9):551-6. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2016.0151. [PubMed: 27541746].
  • 13. Lehtinen V, Nasanen J, Sarvas R. A little silly and empty-headed: older adults' understandings of social networking sites. Proceedings of the 23rd British HCI Group Annual Conference on People and Computers: Celebrating People and Technology. British Computer Society. 2009.
  • 14. Chen K, Chan AH. Use or non-use of gerontechnology--a qualitative study. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2013;10(10):4645-66. doi: 10.3390/ijerph10104645. [PubMed: 24084674].
  • 15. VanderStoep SW, Johnson DD. Research methods for everyday life: Blending qualitative and quantitative approaches. John Wiley & Sons; 2008.
  • 16. Colaizzi PF. Psychological research as the phenomenologist views it. Existential-phenomenological alternatives for psychology. Oxford University Press; 1978.Valle RS.
  • 17. Gharibpoor M, Allameh S, Abrishamkar M. New concept of social network citizenship behavior: Definition and elements. Aust J Basic Appl Sci. 2012;6(9):154-63.
  • 18. Lincoln YS, Guba EG. Naturalistic inquiry. Sage; 1985. doi: 10.1016/0147-1767(85)90062-8.
  • 19. Hutto C, Bell C. Social media gerontology: Understanding social media usage among a unique and expanding community of users. System Sciences (HICSS), 2014 47th Hawaii International Conference. 2014. p. 1755-64.
  • 20. Carpenter BD, Buday S. Computer use among older adults in a naturally occurring retirement community. Computers Human Behav. 2007;23(6):3012-24. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2006.08.015.
  • 21. Xie B, Watkins I, Golbeck J, Huang M. Understanding and Changing Older Adults' Perceptions and Learning of Social Media. Educ Gerontol. 2012;38(4):282-96. doi: 10.1080/03601277.2010.544580. [PubMed: 22639483].
  • 22. Leist AK. Social media use of older adults: a mini-review. Gerontology. 2013;59(4):378-84. doi: 10.1159/000346818. [PubMed: 23594915].
  • 23. Chou WH, Lai YT, Liu KH. User requirements of social media for the elderly: a case study in Taiwan. Behav Inf Technol. 2013;32(9):920-37.
  • 24. Stephens MA, Fekete EM, Franks MM, Rook KS, Druley JA, Greene K. Spouses' use of pressure and persuasion to promote osteoarthritis patients' medical adherence after orthopedic surgery. Health Psychol. 2009;28(1):48-55. doi: 10.1037/a0012385. [PubMed: 19210017].
  • 25. Wang Y, Min Q, Han S. Understanding the effects of trust and risk on individual behavior toward social media platforms: A meta-analysis of the empirical evidence. Computers Human Behav. 2016;56:34-44. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2015.11.011.
  • 26. Pfeil U, Zaphiris P, Wilson S. Older adults’ perceptions and experiences of online social support. Interacting with Computers. 2009;21(3):159-72. doi: 10.1016/j.intcom.2008.12.001.
  • 27. Shin DH. The effects of trust, security and privacy in social networking: A security-based approach to understand the pattern of adoption. Interacting with Computers. 2010;22(5):428-38. doi: 10.1016/j.intcom.2010.05.001.
  • 28. Braun MT. Obstacles to social networking website use among older adults. Computers Human Behav. 2013;29(3):673-80. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2012.12.004.
  • 29. Zhu H, Huang C, Lu R, Li H. Modelling information dissemination under privacy concerns in social media. Physica A: Statistic Mechanic App. 2016;449:53-63. doi: 10.1016/j.physa.2015.12.044.

Featured Image:

Creative Commons License Except where otherwise noted, this work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 4.0 International License .

Search Relations:



Create Citiation Alert
via Google Reader

Readers' Comments